View Full Version : Strings of Draft Picks
Scorlibo
12-11-2013, 12:22 PM
I was looking the other day at pick 6 in 2012, with which we have secured Jackson Macrae. This was a compensation pick for losing Callan Ward. We drafted Callan Ward in 2007 with pick 19, the pick which we got from Richmond in exchange for Jordan McMahon. McMahon was drafted with pick 10 in 2000.
So essentially, we traded pick 10 in 2000 for pick 6 in 2012, plus 174 games of service (114 games from McMahon and 60 from Ward).
What are some other long strings of trades you can think of?
bulldogtragic
12-11-2013, 12:30 PM
1996: Pick 10: Nathan Brown
137 Games
For
2003: Pick 6 (on traded) Lachlan Veale & Pick 20 (on traded) Peter Street
0 games & 61 Games
Both De-listed
Is this long enough?
Mofra
12-11-2013, 12:38 PM
Pick #7 1988 - Leon Cameron
172 games
Then traded for picks #37 & #66 in 1999
#37 Mitch Hahn - 181 games
#66 Ryan Hargrave - 203 games
Effectively a total of 556 games from pick #7 1988
Sedat
12-11-2013, 02:55 PM
Pick #7 1988 - Leon Cameron
172 games
Then traded for picks #37 & #66 in 1999
#37 Mitch Hahn - 181 games
#66 Ryan Hargrave - 203 games
Effectively a total of 556 games from pick #7 1988
Was thinking exactly this when I started reading this thread...this string will be hard to top.
bulldogtragic
12-11-2013, 03:19 PM
1994: pick 14: Martin
For
1999: pick 32: Giansiracusa & Trent Bartlett
The Ugg!!!! & Heaps of games and goals
bulldogtragic
12-11-2013, 03:25 PM
1989: Barry Standfield
98 games
For
1996: pick 47: Montgomery
78 games
For
1999: Nathan Eagleton
200+ games
= over 400 games
bulldogtragic
12-11-2013, 03:32 PM
Pick 17 1992 - Kym Koster
For
Pick 9 1995 - Allen Jakovich
whythelongface
12-11-2013, 07:07 PM
Pick 17 1992 - Kym Koster
For
Pick 9 1995 - Allen Jakovich
I think we have a winner :)
Twodogs
12-11-2013, 07:43 PM
1989: Barry Standfield
98 games
For
1996: pick 47: Montgomery
78 games
For
1999: Nathan Eagleton
200+ games
= over 400 games
Stephen Powell
44 games at Melbourne
68 games at St Kilda
Was also in that trade.
Remi Moses
12-11-2013, 07:55 PM
Remember the rage when they traded Leon, Monty and Powell?
Imagine if this site existed,all post records would have been smashed !
Remember nearly driving off the road when Healy and Hookesy broke the news on AW.
Yep, I was pretty pissed about it for a while. Reckon it destroyed the fabric of our playing group for a while too.
bornadog
13-11-2013, 08:39 AM
Yep, I was pretty pissed about it for a while. Reckon it destroyed the fabric of our playing group for a while too.
Me too Chef, especially Leon going.
Scorlibo
13-11-2013, 09:51 AM
Yep, I was pretty pissed about it for a while. Reckon it destroyed the fabric of our playing group for a while too.
Yep, I hope it never happens again. There is some solace to take from Monty having returned as a player and then a coach and Leon as a coach, but for mine you just can't rip players away from the Club like that.
I wasn't surprised when Nathan Brown left to Richmond, doing what we did makes it easy for players to leave guilt-free.
Trading Martin, Monty, Cameron and Powell netted us a bunch of mid range draft picks and Nathan Eagleton. You can't then say that it was the catalyst for our success in the '99 draft - we simply drafted well.
Mofra
13-11-2013, 10:59 AM
Trading Martin, Monty, Cameron and Powell netted us a bunch of mid range draft picks and Nathan Eagleton. You can't then say that it was the catalyst for our success in the '99 draft - we simply drafted well.
If we reated that particular draft particularly highly, then maximising selection in that draft must surely be regarded as a successful strategy.
We clearly don't rate the 2013 draft very highly, hence we will have only 3 (perhaps only 2) live selections this year.
Scorlibo
13-11-2013, 03:37 PM
If we reated that particular draft particularly highly, then maximising selection in that draft must surely be regarded as a successful strategy.
We clearly don't rate the 2013 draft very highly, hence we will have only 3 (perhaps only 2) live selections this year.
Fair enough but if we'd just done 'okay' with those selections in '99 people would be viewing the trades with disgust, instead we drafted incredibly well and generally people accept it. You don't usually draft a Daniel Giansiracusa with #32 or Ryan Hargrave with #66, even in '99.
Mofra
13-11-2013, 04:02 PM
Fair enough but if we'd just done 'okay' with those selections in '99 people would be viewing the trades with disgust, instead we drafted incredibly well and generally people accept it. You don't usually draft a Daniel Giansiracusa with #32 or Ryan Hargrave with #66, even in '99.
The whispers about Leon even at the time meant some were quite happy with the trade
Maddog37
13-11-2013, 04:10 PM
What were the whispers Mofra?
Remi Moses
13-11-2013, 04:47 PM
The whispers about Leon even at the time meant some were quite happy with the trade
I thought Leon's time was up. Monty paid the price for some poor finals, but Powell I thought was unlucky.Broke through in 99 and became a good contributor.
Those who weren't happy with those trades should realise those players we got in formed a strong core of our side from 05 onwards.
Gutsy decision in hindsight
Mofra
13-11-2013, 04:56 PM
What were the whispers Mofra?
Nothing untoward, just he started to like a drink a little more than he liked training. I don't believe we exactly traded him at his peak, either.
An average of 176 games from a top ten pick is something Clayton didn't manage with us - I'm calling Cameron's selection at pick #7 a success
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.