azabob
03-06-2014, 09:04 PM
A well balanced article. Re-enforces what some have been saying on this forum.
When big AFL clubs are successful they appear even bigger again. When those clubs are not winning they somehow still seem to appear almost as big and interesting.
When small clubs are winning they become interesting. When they start losing they are prone to become invisible. When the team drops, the club falls off the cliff.
The Western Bulldogs have become invisible. St Kilda is fading. This is in part cyclical - they have stopped winning and they have become less relevant - which is why they have agitated successfully for those structural inequities to be addressed at a meeting on Wednesday of club presidents.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/facebook-fans-and-footy-how-relevant-is-your-club-20140603-zrwo2.html#ixzz33Zag7kvM
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/afl/afl-news/facebook-fans-and-footy-how-relevant-is-your-club-20140603-zrwo2.html
When big AFL clubs are successful they appear even bigger again. When those clubs are not winning they somehow still seem to appear almost as big and interesting.
When small clubs are winning they become interesting. When they start losing they are prone to become invisible. When the team drops, the club falls off the cliff.
The Western Bulldogs have become invisible. St Kilda is fading. This is in part cyclical - they have stopped winning and they have become less relevant - which is why they have agitated successfully for those structural inequities to be addressed at a meeting on Wednesday of club presidents.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/facebook-fans-and-footy-how-relevant-is-your-club-20140603-zrwo2.html#ixzz33Zag7kvM
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/afl/afl-news/facebook-fans-and-footy-how-relevant-is-your-club-20140603-zrwo2.html