PDA

View Full Version : Adcock Upgraded



bornadog
31-03-2016, 04:28 PM
Notice from Club.


Rookie Jed Adcock has been elevated to the Club’s Primary List after being recruited to the Club with pick 46 in the 2015 rookie draft.The 30-year-old Adcock spent twelves seasons with the Brisbane Lions, including two as captain.
He will replace Clay Smith who has been transferred to the Long Term injury list.

Cyberdoggie
31-03-2016, 05:09 PM
Weird, didn't think there was a need to elevate him just yet.

Is he ahead of Lin Jong and others on the fringe?

bornadog
31-03-2016, 05:11 PM
Weird, didn't think there was a need to elevate him just yet.

Is he ahead of Lin Jong and others on the fringe?

We are two players down with Crameri and Clay, but agree why is it necessary to upgrade him?

ledge
31-03-2016, 05:16 PM
Maybe we are playing him this week ?

SonofScray
31-03-2016, 05:36 PM
Good news for Adcock, they must have an itch to give him a game soon.

Might be a sign that they are putting the brakes on Clay Smith a little as well. Holding him back until next year.

G-Mo77
31-03-2016, 05:39 PM
I thought he was already upgraded due to the Crameri suspension?

LostDoggy
31-03-2016, 05:44 PM
I don't think they have upgraded anyone to replace Crameri yet.

Greystache
31-03-2016, 06:00 PM
Strange one. I thought he was pretty ordinary in the NAB Challenge

bulldogtragic
31-03-2016, 06:03 PM
Bevo let him live at his house with his family until he found a place in Melbourne. I'd dare guess Bevo rates him highly.

F'scary
31-03-2016, 06:06 PM
It's a payrise for him, isn't it?

always right
31-03-2016, 06:08 PM
Surely he doesn't play this week.

GVGjr
31-03-2016, 06:26 PM
He said at the player sponsors that he won't be upgraded until they think he is ready for a senior game. The club had been clear on that point. I suspect something else has changed

Testekill
31-03-2016, 06:35 PM
Surely he doesn't play this week.

Only an emergency

ratsmac
31-03-2016, 06:37 PM
Very interesting!

chef
31-03-2016, 06:58 PM
I guess it was only a matter of time. Quality player who wont look out of place in our team.

Cracking depth we have.

The Bulldogs Bite
31-03-2016, 10:25 PM
Strange one. I thought he was pretty ordinary in the NAB Challenge

Yeah, I wasn't too impressed by him.

Having said that, Adams looked ordinary in the intra club and has improved with every game. I know Adcock is much more experienced, but getting used to a new club would still take a little bit of time.

Not sure why we elevated him right now, though.

Rocco Jones
31-03-2016, 10:30 PM
I think he suits our style. Creates defensive pressure and can play in multiple positions. I think it's exactly what Beveridge is looking for in the 20-22 spots.

1eyedog
31-03-2016, 11:26 PM
We've still got an extremely young list with an average of 57 games. He's a 200 game player who brings a wealth of experience and composure to a young group.

Twodogs
01-04-2016, 03:35 AM
He might be our Daniel Cross.

Ghost Dog
01-04-2016, 04:02 AM
Yeah, I wasn't too impressed by him.

Having said that, Adams looked ordinary in the intra club and has improved with every game. I know Adcock is much more experienced, but getting used to a new club would still take a little bit of time.

Not sure why we elevated him right now, though.

I don't think Adcock was playing to impress Dogs supporters in the NAB. The older players know it's a long year, and I can recall him saying this in a club interview. I think he'll go ok when the chips are down.

chef
01-04-2016, 07:38 AM
I don't think Adcock was playing to impress Dogs supporters in the NAB. The older players know it's a long year, and I can recall him saying this in a club interview. I think he'll go ok when the chips are down.

Yep. We've seen what he can do over a good career at Brissie over 200 odd games. Im not sure why one praccy match is so important

Mantis
01-04-2016, 07:39 AM
He might be our Daniel Cross.

In what way?

I would prefer that Adcock is used as a last resort and would prefer the likes if Dale, Hrovat, Jong and Webb to be played before him.

Twodogs
01-04-2016, 08:18 AM
In what way?

I would prefer that Adcock is used as a last resort and would prefer the likes if Dale, Hrovat, Jong and Webb to be played before him.


An experienced player with a few games left in him that may show his old club that he could have played some more useful football for them.

jeemak
01-04-2016, 09:30 AM
Bev confirmed player management in the first portion of the season will be important due to the six day break issue. His elevation tells me some players will be rested and replaced by experience and youth alike.

Bulldog4life
01-04-2016, 09:56 AM
Bev confirmed player management in the first portion of the season will be important due to the six day break issue. His elevation tells me some players will be rested and replaced by experience and youth alike.

Thanks Jeemak. Whatever Bevo decides on is good enough for me. Whoever he picks is good enough for me.

Happy Days
01-04-2016, 04:16 PM
I'm thinking there's doubt on M Boyd. Just a hunch.

bornadog
09-06-2016, 06:08 PM
Adcock is back to Rookie list

F'scary
09-06-2016, 06:16 PM
Adcock is back to Rookie list

He has played 6 games (so far) this season. And that is 6 more than:

Webb: 0
Honeychurch: 0

Twodogs
09-06-2016, 06:28 PM
Adcock is back to Rookie list

Has somebody else come off the LTI list? Clay Smith I guess.

azabob
09-06-2016, 06:41 PM
Has somebody else come off the LTI list? Clay Smith I guess.

Yes. Prudden has been put onto the LTI.

boydogs
09-06-2016, 06:45 PM
Has somebody else come off the LTI list? Clay Smith I guess.

Yes, and Josh Prudden has gone on to it

Rocco Jones
09-06-2016, 06:47 PM
Just saw article stating Adcock is back to the rookie list.

Twodogs
09-06-2016, 07:31 PM
Didn't Prudden do his knee a few weeks ago?

bornadog
09-06-2016, 10:01 PM
adcock is back to rookie list


just saw article stating adcock is back to the rookie list.

hi rj

Rocco Jones
09-06-2016, 10:03 PM
hi rj

Sorry. I had earlier posted asking if there was confirmation and couldn't delete post.

bornadog
09-06-2016, 10:05 PM
Sorry. I had earlier posted asking if there was confirmation and couldn't delete post.

No Probs. The article was included in the injury thread