View Full Version : The Monday Soapbox - R9
GVGjr
13-05-2024, 07:29 AM
Have a rant about something that annoyed you for this round.
It could be the AFL, umpiring, Kane Cornes, Channel 7 commentary, Rules or even opposition players etc
Dogs 24/7
13-05-2024, 08:42 AM
Listening to negative comments on SEN even after our emphatic win. Im not sure what else we could have done.
bornadog
13-05-2024, 08:58 AM
Seagulls at the MCG - bring back the Eagle
GVGjr
13-05-2024, 09:01 AM
Seagulls at the MCG - bring back the Eagle
That was annoying.
bornadog
13-05-2024, 09:02 AM
That was annoying.
Especially when they hit you with their droppings :D Lucky it was my sleeve and not my head
EasternWest
13-05-2024, 09:06 AM
Especially when they hit you with their droppings :D Lucky it was my sleeve and not my head
Lucky for who?
bornadog
13-05-2024, 09:07 AM
Lucky for who?
haha - lets say the sea gull :D
jeemak
13-05-2024, 02:00 PM
Listening to negative comments on SEN even after our emphatic win. Im not sure what else we could have done.
We should have won by 125 points?
GVGjr
13-05-2024, 02:59 PM
The extra time discussions that follow after every drawn game is annoying. A draw is a result.
bornadog
13-05-2024, 03:07 PM
The extra time discussions that follow after every drawn game is annoying. A draw is a result.
Agree. 2 points for a draw and 4 for a win.
bulldogsthru&thru
13-05-2024, 03:10 PM
There's like 1 or 2 draws a year. Its fine. Extra time is just a stupid idea.
Axe Man
13-05-2024, 03:10 PM
Seagulls at the MCG - bring back the Eagle
I'm not sure how Nathan Eagleton would have helped but I'm all for it.
Perhaps the lights reflecting from his shiny bonce deters the gulls?
Sedat
13-05-2024, 03:15 PM
I'm not sure how Nathan Eagleton would have helped but I'm all for it.
Perhaps the lights reflecting from his shiny bonce deters the gulls?
Isn't he both an eagle and a seagull?
Axe Man
13-05-2024, 03:19 PM
Isn't he both an eagle and a seagull?
Touche
azabob
13-05-2024, 08:14 PM
Gee whiz. The afl must have missed Chris Scott press conference and his five minute and thirty second monologue on the umpiring and how the non advantage call on Cameron was wrong.
No please explain and no fine.
soupman
13-05-2024, 08:19 PM
Honestly I thought the umpire was doing them a favour.
There was no way that kick was "taking advantage", it was as rushed a bomb to a contest as possible and it was only sheer luck that it ended up bobbling into Camerons hands.
1eyedog
14-05-2024, 08:57 AM
Honestly I thought the umpire was doing them a favour.
There was no way that kick was "taking advantage", it was as rushed a bomb to a contest as possible and it was only sheer luck that it ended up bobbling into Camerons hands.
The counter argument seems to be that fast ball movement and, in this instance a chaos ball to the teeth of goal, is the epitome of advantage.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.