Re: Following our exes...................
Quote:
Originally Posted by
azabob
Don’t get yourself confused Mr.Mak… just because I’m not English number one ticket holder doesn’t mean I am on the Sweet bandwagon.
My post/ response to hujsh had nothing to do with you. I was just reinforcing my belief that measuring rucks quantitatively on tangible elements of their game is silly.
Re: Following our exes...................
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hujsh
What were the intangibles like?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
azabob
Below average
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hujsh
Disappointing. I expected more from the Candy Man
They'll get better if he has an extended run outside of the seniors. Now he's playing ones for the moment he's got to be really careful they don't slip too far.
Re: Following our exes...................
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bornadog
He is a good tap ruck, but 5 disposals doesn't cut it
What about Scott Wynd winning a Brownlow and couldn?t kick?
I?m sure he got 3 votes on a day he didn?t register a kick.
I really don?t care if our ruck gets 0 possessions if we win the game. Minimum he has to do is nullify the opposition ruck.
Re: Following our exes...................
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JanLorMill
What about Scott Wynd winning a Brownlow and couldn?t kick?
I?m sure he got 3 votes on a day he didn?t register a kick.
I really don?t care if our ruck gets 0 possessions if we win the game. Minimum he has to do is nullify the opposition ruck.
In the year Wynd won the Brownlow he averaged 18 touches per game and six marks.
To give you an example. In a game he got two votes in 1992.
28 touches. 12 kicks. 16 handballs. 6 marks.
Re: Following our exes...................
Quote:
Originally Posted by
angelopetraglia
In the year Wynd won the Brownlow he averaged 18 touches per game and six marks.
To give you an example. In a game he got two votes in 1992.
28 touches. 12 kicks. 16 handballs. 6 marks.
Bet you his intangibles were off the charts that game.
Re: Following our exes...................
I think his intangibles were well supported and kept firmly in place in that game.
Re: Following our exes...................
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hotdog60
I think his intangibles were well supported and kept firmly in place in that game.
You mean his intangiballs?
Re: Following our exes...................
He was pretty good tonight. Won the points over Marshall at stoppages and wasn't a liability around the ground - Port would have taken that any day of the week.
Re: Following our exes...................
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sedat
He was pretty good tonight. Won the points over Marshall at stoppages and wasn't a liability around the ground - Port would have taken that any day of the week.
Yep. Really good tonight.
Re: Following our exes...................
Marshall was injured early and obviously hampered by it, but Sweet's follow up work was quite good.
Didn't offer a lot in terms of quality around the ground, but encouraging for him.
Re: Following our exes...................
Quote:
Originally Posted by
angelopetraglia
In the year Wynd won the Brownlow he averaged 18 touches per game and six marks.
To give you an example. In a game he got two votes in 1992.
28 touches. 12 kicks. 16 handballs. 6 marks.
1991 round 24 vs Bears 0 kicks 15hb 5m 14ho 4t 3 Brownlow votes
Re: Following our exes...................
Lachlan Sullivan will debut for Collingwood
Re: Following our exes...................
Good luck to Sullivan. Hope he plays well. I wonder what would have happened had we chosen Lachlan instead of McComb.
Re: Following our exes...................
Quote:
Originally Posted by
josie
Good luck to Sullivan. Hope he plays well. I wonder what would have happened had we chosen Lachlan instead of McComb.
Probably the same as LS racks up 30+ touches a week and promoted to be an ineffective forward. Good luck to him at the reigning premiers.
Re: Following our exes...................
Good point BDTragic. Would not have been given mid time with us.