Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bornadog
I thought Gallagher showed some real potential even though his numbers were low. He spent a little time in the centre as well to get some experience. Hopefully he gets another go next week.
I liked Gallagher and was in favour of his selection, but am more making the point that it meant we needed to play another midfielder.
We took in Gallagher and Sanders as kids who would need to be managed, as well as played Harmes as a full-time mid when I think he's best suited to a forward flank and taking a turn through the midfield.
I think Laith and McNeil were then pushed on-ball or on a wing to balance those rotations and the mix was completely wrong.
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Bulldogs Bite
I agree but the 2+ years since suggests some of that was coincidental (i.e. McNeil and to a lesser degree Scott). Our midfield was absolutely dominating in the early part of 2021 and Martin gave us incredible presence (which we just don't get from English).
A lot of us have grown tired of seeing mids play as HFFers, but there's a reason why it happens - it's because the likes of McNeil and VDM offer zero.
A better question would be why haven't we loaded up on small forwards? It's been a problem for a while. We have TOO many talls. We keep McNeil (dumb - move on), Clarke is in his second year, and Arty is still raw. That's it. It's not a lot to choose from.
Weightman doesn't count either - he plays nothing like a small forward.
There was a contest at the Punt Rd end, I think Lobb took a mark 70 out and turned to get it in quick. Naughton and Weightman were both 50+ metres away calling for it to be kicked to them. They both flew for the unrealistic specify, Melbourne brought the ball to ground and cleared it away.
As soon as Lobb turned, Weightman should have led up at the ball. He likely would have dragged an opponent with him, at least improving Naughton's odds and at best getting a mark on the lead for himself.
Selfish, unrealistic, lazy, egotistical, dumb...I don't know what describes them best.
Why do we not have players hitting up at the ball? Why do our forwards not work to position for the outlet kicks? It is SO frustrating.
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jazzadogs
There was a contest at the Punt Rd end, I think Lobb took a mark 70 out and turned to get it in quick. Naughton and Weightman were both 50+ metres away calling for it to be kicked to them. They both flew for the unrealistic specify, Melbourne brought the ball to ground and cleared it away.
As soon as Lobb turned, Weightman should have led up at the ball. He likely would have dragged an opponent with him, at least improving Naughton's odds and at best getting a mark on the lead for himself.
Selfish, unrealistic, lazy, egotistical, dumb...I don't know what describes them best.
Why do we not have players hitting up at the ball? Why do our forwards not work to position for the outlet kicks? It is SO frustrating.
I thought Lobb was too slow to move as Weightman was on his own for a long time.
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
This cost us a goal against the trend of play. The downfield to Max Gawn. I didn't see it on game day. But gee whiz. Horrible. https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/can...Qoo5ZrWQNwJQlA
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
angelopetraglia
I didn't see it at the time, but I knew it would be some bullsh*t like that. The only surprising part is that he didn't completely flop and fall to the ground.
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
The one I recall was Lobb marking at half forward, Weightman by himself about 30 metres out from goal jumping up and down waving his arms in the air. Lobb walks back to take his kick, by which time Melbourne have flooded back. Lack of urgency.
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bornadog
I thought Lobb was too slow to move as Weightman was on his own for a long time.
I might be combining two passages in my head, but my point remains that Weightman should be hitting up the player with the ball and getting front and centre. If he's the only one in the contest...sure, fly as high as you want and force a contest. But we are already tall enough without a short forward leaping as well!
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
D Mitchell
The one I recall was Lobb marking at half forward, Weightman by himself about 30 metres out from goal jumping up and down waving his arms in the air. Lobb walks back to take his kick, by which time Melbourne have flooded back. Lack of urgency.
yes that one
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
angelopetraglia
100% Melbourne went to the AFL sooking about Gawn's treatment against the Swans and we've paid the price for it.
I hate the AFEL and its umpire directives.
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jazzadogs
There was a contest at the Punt Rd end, I think Lobb took a mark 70 out and turned to get it in quick. Naughton and Weightman were both 50+ metres away calling for it to be kicked to them. They both flew for the unrealistic specify, Melbourne brought the ball to ground and cleared it away.
As soon as Lobb turned, Weightman should have led up at the ball. He likely would have dragged an opponent with him, at least improving Naughton's odds and at best getting a mark on the lead for himself.
Selfish, unrealistic, lazy, egotistical, dumb...I don't know what describes them best.
Why do we not have players hitting up at the ball? Why do our forwards not work to position for the outlet kicks? It is SO frustrating.
100% correct. All the adjectives you suggest apply.
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jeemak
100% Melbourne went to the AFL sooking about Gawn's treatment against the Swans and we've paid the price for it.
I hate the AFEL and its umpire directives.
I thought the umpiring was appalling yesterday. Didn't cost us the game, but boy oh boy some strange decisions. like that one.
I ran into a former umpire at half time (sometimes woofer poster) and he couldn't believe the umpiring in the first half.
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Dees v Dogs analysis - Were the Bulldogs 'not up for the fight?' | AFL 360 | Fox Footy
https://youtu.be/_Wp0W7Db-iI?si=tXKVBMsZFrT9PI7w
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Where did Williams play on the weekend? I don't even think I saw him.
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jDogs
Where did Williams play on the weekend? I don't even think I saw him.
I noticed him in the last quarter on the wing at a centre bounce. He had 18 disposals but they must have been up the Punt Rd end on the other side of the ground to where I was sitting.
Re: Demons V Bulldogs - Round 1 17/3/24 MCG 1.00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by
D Mitchell
The one I recall was Lobb marking at half forward, Weightman by himself about 30 metres out from goal jumping up and down waving his arms in the air. Lobb walks back to take his kick, by which time Melbourne have flooded back. Lack of urgency.
Happened all over the ground. Killed any purposeful movement out of the backline all day.
Melbourne rarely stopped to walk back from the mark. They would stand ground while a teammate ran past or quickly kick low to a teammate who had made position 35 metres ahead. (Usually With his opponent standing 15 metres away minding grass)
The contrast between the two teams was glaring. Can we please buy Melbourne?s game plan.