-
07-03-2016, 08:37 PM
#241
Re: NAB Challenge Game 2 v Melbourne, 6 March 2016 at Craigieburn
Fourth Q observations:
-Delivery to the forward line hasn't been great all day but the conditions haven't helped
- Our back half has held up quite well considering how undermanned it is, good signs
- Younger players definitely look tired, some poor disposal and bad decision making creeping in
- Just haven't been able to get our hands on the ball to slow down the tempo
-
08-03-2016, 03:06 PM
#242
Re: NAB Challenge Game 2 v Melbourne, 6 March 2016 at Craigieburn
from AFL
WESTERN Bulldogs rookie Luke Goetz will fight his fine from the Match Review Panel for pushing Melbourne defender Colin Garland over the fence.
The ruckman, who only played a small amount of game time in Sunday's NAB Challenge clash with the Dees, was offered a $1000 fine for an early guilty plea over the incident.
The MRP classified his shove on Garland as a misconduct offence, attracting a $1500 fine.
Goetz now faces paying the higher fine if his challenge is unsuccessful.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
08-03-2016, 03:10 PM
#243
Re: NAB Challenge Game 2 v Melbourne, 6 March 2016 at Craigieburn
Should just take it on the chin. Did a stupid thing and copped a right punishment for it. He should be thankful he didn't serious hurt the fellow he pushed. Not the type of thing I like seeing our players do.
The curse is dead.
-
08-03-2016, 10:46 PM
#244
Re: NAB Challenge Game 2 v Melbourne, 6 March 2016 at Craigieburn
Lost the appeal and now pays a $1500 fine. Baffling decision to appeal.....who's advising him?
I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken.
-
08-03-2016, 11:04 PM
#245
Re: NAB Challenge Game 2 v Melbourne, 6 March 2016 at Craigieburn
Originally Posted by
always right
Lost the appeal and now pays a $1500 fine. Baffling decision to appeal.....who's advising him?
Tania Hird and Paul Little.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
08-03-2016, 11:19 PM
#246
Re: NAB Challenge Game 2 v Melbourne, 6 March 2016 at Craigieburn
Would love to know what the rotation qty was for each side.
Almost gurantee we had half the amount of the Chalet Demons whilst still fielding one less player during the game.
Same happeed against GWSucks with us having two less players through rotations.
Think we're in pretty good shape.
-
09-03-2016, 05:19 PM
#247
Re: NAB Challenge Game 2 v Melbourne, 6 March 2016 at Craigieburn
Originally Posted by
redders70
Would love to know what the rotation qty was for each side.
Almost gurantee we had half the amount of the Chalet Demons whilst still fielding one less player during the game.
Same happeed against GWSucks with us having two less players through rotations.
Think we're in pretty good shape.
I think we had about 102 and they had 94 or something like that. I reckon I read it on melbournes bigfooty page.
-
09-03-2016, 11:46 PM
#248
Re: NAB Challenge Game 2 v Melbourne, 6 March 2016 at Craigieburn
Originally Posted by
Maddog37
I think we had about 102 and they had 94 or something like that. I reckon I read it on melbournes bigfooty page.
I was quoted that we had 88 and they were more in the 130 range, but I don't really know.
Life is to be Enjoyed not Endured