-
06-07-2024, 11:06 AM
#196
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 VS Port Adelaide
Originally Posted by
Smads57
Personally, I expected Clarke to be the travelling emergency when the three emergency players were named (Clarke, Caleb, Baker). Caleb needs to play VFL if he is to get back in the senior side and with Baker only playing one quarter of footy last week, it makes no sense holding him out of a game a second week in a row.
Maybe the real issue is the selected emergencies. Would Clarke be travelling if the emergencies were Cleary, Poulter, Clarke?
Yes? We just named two medium backs (Khamis & Coffield) and if we can't fit Baker in, Poulter is basically a taller more one-sided version.
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
06-07-2024, 11:06 AM
#197
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 VS Port Adelaide
Originally Posted by
Mofra
McNeill creates more opportunities.
Chook more likely to take the ones he creates. His field kicking was atrocious in his one AFL game though so I think he needs more time/exposure to build enough composure at the top level.
Yes I hope with time Clarke becomes the better of the two, at the moment though you'd have to be insane to think that.
-
06-07-2024, 11:56 AM
#198
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 VS Port Adelaide
I still can't work out Garcia, how could he not even be in the emergencies? Is anyone feeling confident about this one? The defence looks average but If some how Lobb and co can stand up, it would be a game changer going forward.
-
06-07-2024, 01:45 PM
#199
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 17 VS Port Adelaide
Originally Posted by
Grantysghost
Sailing metaphors on woof.
Now I've seen it all....
Or is it perhaps, an alternative spelling, abbreviation for giblet?