-
06-07-2024, 07:57 PM
#166
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
Sweet did okay but English was the better player on the day. The difference wasn't great though and English should have torched him given he's played just 18 senior games.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
06-07-2024, 08:01 PM
#167
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
In a lot of ways a ruck is only as influential as his midfielders, or the opposition's will allow him to be. In Sweet's case both ours and Ports made him look really effective early.
Not saying he didn't have some decisive taps, but they were only half the story today.
That doesn't get Tim off the hook though. He should have been prepared for Sweet to want to make a statement and he was too soft in the early parts of the game. If he doesn't get his head into the game he's doing both us and himself a disservice.
TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.
-
06-07-2024, 09:47 PM
#168
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
English cooked him you guys are crazy. There is plenty of other real shit to be mad about.
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -
-
06-07-2024, 10:08 PM
#169
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
Sweet helped wit h the good start but didn’t have a huge influence beyond highlighting just how little aggression Tim invests into the game.
Time and Tide Waits For No Man
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
06-07-2024, 10:18 PM
#170
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
Originally Posted by
Happy Days
English cooked him you guys are crazy. There is plenty of other real shit to be mad about.
My big issue on the day is the midfield. Rozee, Butler and Wines completely took control. Rozee's first quarter with 18 disposals, finished us off
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
07-07-2024, 09:08 AM
#171
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
It was so weird when Darcy started in the centre square for the first contest. When has a club ever done that?
English got the points, Sweet was effective in the middle, Port’s entire midfield made ours look slow and second rate. We should’ve been more powerful and experienced and beaten up on them, instead we seemed overawed by the next tier of the comp coming at us. And not for the first time.
Good on Sweet, but he won’t be their first ruck when they’ve got a full list.
Have you heard Butters wants to come to the Dogs?
-
07-07-2024, 02:16 PM
#172
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
Originally Posted by
Go_Dogs
It was so weird when Darcy started in the centre square for the first contest. When has a club ever done that
Was a strange move to try and unbalance Port, but didn't work. Darcy doesn't have the strength to be a ruckman yet.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
07-07-2024, 03:02 PM
#173
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
It one of those things if it came off, brilliant bit of coaching but it didn't so wear the result.
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...
-
07-07-2024, 09:46 PM
#174
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
Originally Posted by
Hotdog60
It one of those things if it came off, brilliant bit of coaching but it didn't so wear the result.
Reliable not Remarkable.
Sorry - this one was one of those ideas that should absolutely been talked about but you don't do it in a critical game.
You have only ONE CHANCE to make a first impression - and your ruckman does that at the first CBD of the day...
What should I tell her? She's going to ask.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
07-07-2024, 09:50 PM
#175
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
Originally Posted by
mjp
Reliable not Remarkable.
Sorry - this one was one of those ideas that should absolutely been talked about but you don't do it in a critical game.
You have only ONE CHANCE to make a first impression - and your ruckman does that at the first CBD of the day...
I said somewhere this was the game English was looked in the eyes and told he needs to dominate his underling physically and aerobically from the outset.
We were way to clever for ourselves with whatever bullshit the Darcy move was, discussed at length or otherwise.
TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
13-09-2024, 10:55 PM
#176
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
Did Sweet win Oort this game against the Hawks and do what English couldn?t?
-
13-09-2024, 11:29 PM
#177
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
The difference is one has heart and the other doesn't
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...
-
13-09-2024, 11:34 PM
#178
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
A real shame the arse dropped out of the market for English.
BORDERLINE FLYING
-
13-09-2024, 11:38 PM
#179
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
Originally Posted by
Rocket Science
A real shame the arse dropped out of the market for English.
Just needs another preseason I reckon.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
13-09-2024, 11:40 PM
#180
Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?
Originally Posted by
Rocket Science
A real shame the arse dropped out of the market for English.
Maybe someone would have upped us if we offer 750 or less?