Thanks Thanks:  17
Likes Likes:  166
Page 18 of 18 FirstFirst ... 89101112131415161718
Results 256 to 262 of 262
  1. #256
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    64,167
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?

    Quote Originally Posted by jazzadogs View Post
    Surely we can concede:
    - Sweet had a strong finals series and was a key part of Port making the prelim
    - we would have/should have kept Sweet, but he chose to leave for greater opportunities at his childhood club in his home state
    - English failed to perform in his final.

    You don't have to be saying that Sweet is better than English, or should have played ahead of English, to acknowledge that he had a good finals series.
    nothing to do with Tim. I just think rucks have to do more than hitouts
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  2. #257
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    64,167
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?

    Quote Originally Posted by JanLorMill View Post
    Which ruck was better? He beat Day and Grundy.
    Didn’t beat Grundy and who is Day?
    Last edited by bornadog; 30-09-2024 at 07:47 PM.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  3. #258
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Didn’t beat Grundy and who is Day?
    Sorry Meek. I know you don’t like Sweet but the general consensus was he beat Grundy, Besides after the GF you can’t have Grundy as the best ruck of the series.

  4. #259
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane.
    Posts
    3,231
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    nothing to do with Tim. I just think rucks have to do more than hitouts
    Absolutely, to me it's all about how much impact any player really but as ruckmen, have in a game and it's not just about stats, it's the 2nd, 3rd, 4th efforts at times, it's the way they help out their midfielders, i mean a forward can have 6 kicks for a game and not one other stat but kick 6 goals, that's having an impact without blowing out the stats sheet, with Sweet what i liked about his finals series was that impact, he's never going to massive amounts pf possessions, but it's all about those other things like the 1 percenters, putting his body on the line etc etc.

  5. Likes josie liked this post
  6. #260
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    4,827
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?

    Yeah. Sweet's chief selling point is he's a competitor with a healthy dose of bastard in him and I'd welcome that back with open arms in the heat of a torrid finals game.
    BORDERLINE FLYING

  7. Likes josie liked this post
  8. #261
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    20,662
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?

    If we just keep persevering we'll eventually reach a consensus on what makes a good ruck. We'll agree which tangible stats matter, and then get working on the intangible stuff that depends on the eye test across hundreds of different people's perspectives.

    Well done Jordon. Always wanted you to stay but that wasn't to be.
    TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

  9. Likes Scorlibo liked this post
  10. #262
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East of the West
    Posts
    9,802
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sweet Jesus: Should Jordan Sweet be our first ruck?

    Quote Originally Posted by jazzadogs View Post
    Surely we can concede:
    - Sweet had a strong finals series and was a key part of Port making the prelim
    - we would have/should have kept Sweet, but he chose to leave for greater opportunities at his childhood club in his home state
    - English failed to perform in his final.

    You don't have to be saying that Sweet is better than English, or should have played ahead of English, to acknowledge that he had a good finals series.
    Some of us can admit that, yes.
    "It's over. It's all over."

  11. Likes Mantis liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •