-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
If we swap Baz for SDK is there a risk we are just be a half way house to Blues? ie poached in a few years?
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Keath is finishing up, Jones and Lobb are both in their 30s and not contracted past next year. SDK and Busslinger gives us genuine key backs for the next decade.
Buss is a long way from 100% bankable. I hope he comes good but he hasn't even played a game yet.
"Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
Originally Posted by
Sedat
Buss is a long way from 100% bankable. I hope he comes good but he hasn't even played a game yet.
Then we do need an SDK.
I was talking the future, and we don't even know if Buzz will cut it at AFL level, but it is a plan
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
Cal Twoomey mentioned today that Collingwood is an unlikely destination for Peatling.
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
josie thanked for this post
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
Originally Posted by
josie
If we swap Baz for SDK is there a risk we are just be a half way house to Blues? ie poached in a few years?
Contract offered would be a long term one
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
josie thanked for this post
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
If we did get SDK for Baz in a trade, what exactly does that mean for Croft? Looking at our spine long term, we'd have:
Tall Defenders - SDK, JOD, Buss, arguably Khamis and Coffield
Rucks - English, Smith
Tall Forwards - Darcy, JUH, Naughton
That's a lot of top end talent that should be playing every week, but what do we do with Croft?
Makes for interesting times ahead with all these flaky rumours around JUH leaving. Because the only way I see everyone fitting (assuming Khamis/Coffield are depth options) is if JUH left and Croft is viewed as a forward, not defender.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
josie thanked for this post
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
Originally Posted by
hujsh
Contract offered would be a long term one
Yep, the BF rumour from last week (that apparently was repeated on Trade Radio today) was that we had offered a lucrative 6 year deal.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
josie thanked for this post
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
Originally Posted by
Virgin-Dog
If we did get SDK for Baz in a trade, what exactly does that mean for Croft? Looking at our spine long term, we'd have:
Tall Defenders - SDK, JOD, Buss, arguably Khamis and Coffield
Rucks - English, Smith
Tall Forwards - Darcy, JUH, Naughton
That's a lot of top end talent that should be playing every week, but what do we do with Croft?
Makes for interesting times ahead with all these flaky rumours around JUH leaving. Because the only way I see everyone fitting (assuming Khamis/Coffield are depth options) is if JUH left and Croft is viewed as a forward, not defender.
Looking at Croft, he is at least 3 years away from building his body and being AFL ready, but I know what you mean with your list above.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
Originally Posted by
ReLoad
Why not both?
I'm not sure we have the trade capital for both. We'll want our picks next year for a shot at Butters. I'd hate to blow capital on SDK if it meant we aren't in with a shot at Butters.
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
Originally Posted by
bulldogsthru&thru
I'm not sure we have the trade capital for both. We'll want our picks next year for a shot at Butters. I'd hate to blow capital on SDK if it meant we aren't in with a shot at Butters.
The way I read Reload's post was SDK plus Geelong's first round pick for Smith
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
Originally Posted by
bornadog
The way I read Reload's post was SDK plus Geelong's first round pick for Smith
Because SDK is contracted, and given the higher currency for KPDs, my feel is that Geelong would be asking us to sweeten the deal... Not just throwing in another first round pick.
I'm not sold on SDK but if the alternative is pick 20 and a future second, I think there is definitely less risk with him.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Trade Rumours 2024
Maybe we could ask Naughton’s thoughts on bringing over SDK given SDK has smashed him every time they’ve been against each other.
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes