Thanks Thanks:  146
Likes Likes:  854
Page 97 of 97 FirstFirst ... 478788899091929394959697
Results 1,441 to 1,452 of 1452
  1. #1441
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,001
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    If we swap Baz for SDK is there a risk we are just be a half way house to Blues? ie poached in a few years?

  2. #1442
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    10,843
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Keath is finishing up, Jones and Lobb are both in their 30s and not contracted past next year. SDK and Busslinger gives us genuine key backs for the next decade.
    Buss is a long way from 100% bankable. I hope he comes good but he hasn't even played a game yet.
    "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

  3. #1443
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    64,035
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    Buss is a long way from 100% bankable. I hope he comes good but he hasn't even played a game yet.
    Then we do need an SDK.

    I was talking the future, and we don't even know if Buzz will cut it at AFL level, but it is a plan
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  4. Likes The bulldog tragician liked this post
  5. #1444
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    14,332
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    Cal Twoomey mentioned today that Collingwood is an unlikely destination for Peatling.
    More of an In Bruges guy?

  6. Thanks josie thanked for this post
  7. #1445
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,352
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    Quote Originally Posted by josie View Post
    If we swap Baz for SDK is there a risk we are just be a half way house to Blues? ie poached in a few years?
    Contract offered would be a long term one

  8. Thanks josie thanked for this post
  9. #1446
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Posts
    176
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    If we did get SDK for Baz in a trade, what exactly does that mean for Croft? Looking at our spine long term, we'd have:

    Tall Defenders - SDK, JOD, Buss, arguably Khamis and Coffield
    Rucks - English, Smith
    Tall Forwards - Darcy, JUH, Naughton

    That's a lot of top end talent that should be playing every week, but what do we do with Croft?

    Makes for interesting times ahead with all these flaky rumours around JUH leaving. Because the only way I see everyone fitting (assuming Khamis/Coffield are depth options) is if JUH left and Croft is viewed as a forward, not defender.

  10. Thanks josie thanked for this post
  11. #1447
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    10,170
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    Quote Originally Posted by hujsh View Post
    Contract offered would be a long term one
    Yep, the BF rumour from last week (that apparently was repeated on Trade Radio today) was that we had offered a lucrative 6 year deal.

  12. Thanks josie thanked for this post
  13. #1448
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    64,035
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    Quote Originally Posted by Virgin-Dog View Post
    If we did get SDK for Baz in a trade, what exactly does that mean for Croft? Looking at our spine long term, we'd have:

    Tall Defenders - SDK, JOD, Buss, arguably Khamis and Coffield
    Rucks - English, Smith
    Tall Forwards - Darcy, JUH, Naughton

    That's a lot of top end talent that should be playing every week, but what do we do with Croft?

    Makes for interesting times ahead with all these flaky rumours around JUH leaving. Because the only way I see everyone fitting (assuming Khamis/Coffield are depth options) is if JUH left and Croft is viewed as a forward, not defender.
    Looking at Croft, he is at least 3 years away from building his body and being AFL ready, but I know what you mean with your list above.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  14. #1449
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    7,362
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    Quote Originally Posted by ReLoad View Post
    Why not both?
    I'm not sure we have the trade capital for both. We'll want our picks next year for a shot at Butters. I'd hate to blow capital on SDK if it meant we aren't in with a shot at Butters.

  15. #1450
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    64,035
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogsthru&thru View Post
    I'm not sure we have the trade capital for both. We'll want our picks next year for a shot at Butters. I'd hate to blow capital on SDK if it meant we aren't in with a shot at Butters.
    The way I read Reload's post was SDK plus Geelong's first round pick for Smith
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  16. #1451
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,656
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    The way I read Reload's post was SDK plus Geelong's first round pick for Smith
    Because SDK is contracted, and given the higher currency for KPDs, my feel is that Geelong would be asking us to sweeten the deal... Not just throwing in another first round pick.

    I'm not sold on SDK but if the alternative is pick 20 and a future second, I think there is definitely less risk with him.

  17. Likes bulldogsthru&thru liked this post
  18. #1452
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,813
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    Maybe we could ask Naughton’s thoughts on bringing over SDK given SDK has smashed him every time they’ve been against each other.
    - I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -

  19. Likes kruder liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •