Thanks Thanks:  5
Likes Likes:  87
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 61 to 73 of 73
  1. #61
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    7,464
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    If Smith played to previous form (or even improved), he probably would've have been the difference between finishing 6th and top 4 and then given us a much better chance to fight out for the flag... and he would've had much more currency if he wanted to still leave.

    But he did his ACL in the pre-season and the rest is history.

    Can't help dumb luck.
    Even if he played and had an awesome year I still think the cats would have played the same hand.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,398
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogsthru&thru View Post
    Even if he played and had an awesome year I still think the cats would have played the same hand.
    Agree. The deal was struck a long time ago.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,398
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Why didn?t the Cats strike last preseason? Because we had leverage and the price would have been much higher if he was contracted. Wait until his contract is finished and then get him to nominate. Get a quality player for cheap as chips.

    The system is wrong. You should only be able to nominate a club when you are a free agent.

  4. Likes EasternWest liked this post
  5. #64
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    20,639
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    If Smith played to previous form (or even improved), he probably would've have been the difference between finishing 6th and top 4 and then given us a much better chance to fight out for the flag... and he would've had much more currency if he wanted to still leave.

    But he did his ACL in the pre-season and the rest is history.

    Can't help dumb luck.
    People forget how good Smith could be. Can't say for sure he'd not have been all over the shop this year, can't say for sure he won't be for the rest of his career. But his 2021 (especially finals) and early to mid 2022 were rolled gold elite. All in his apparently non-preferred role.

    Anything close to that this year would have put so much more quality in the places we lack versus a Brisbane. But as you say, can't help dumb luck.

    He'll enjoy his time inside until he gets found out and put back into his allegedly non-preferred role.
    TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

  6. #65
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    41,534
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    While we landed Kennedy how do we interpret that we were being linked to players like Barrass, Houston and Peatling but they preferred other clubs?
    Is it our lower profile, the fact that we don't draw marquee games or have a huge supporter base or could it be Bevo's undeserved media reputation of being a coach that throws the magnets around?
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  7. #66
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    41,534
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Quote Originally Posted by jeemak View Post
    People forget how good Smith could be. Can't say for sure he'd not have been all over the shop this year, can't say for sure he won't be for the rest of his career. But his 2021 (especially finals) and early to mid 2022 were rolled gold elite. All in his apparently non-preferred role.

    Anything close to that this year would have put so much more quality in the places we lack versus a Brisbane. But as you say, can't help dumb luck.

    He'll enjoy his time inside until he gets found out and put back into his allegedly non-preferred role.
    Smith's debut season was as good as anyone could have expected. He was/is highly talented and athletically blessed.
    He's still got some work to do with his foot skills but if his focus improves his best football might still be in front of him.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  8. #67
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,467
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Quote Originally Posted by GVGjr View Post
    While we landed Kennedy how do we interpret that we were being linked to players like Barrass, Houston and Peatling but they preferred other clubs?
    Is it our lower profile, the fact that we don't draw marquee games or have a huge supporter base or could it be Bevo's undeserved media reputation of being a coach that throws the magnets around?
    Peatling seems it was money. Cant say for the others

  9. #68
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    15,092
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogsthru&thru View Post
    Even if he played and had an awesome year I still think the cats would have played the same hand.
    Perhaps, but the media narrative that a late 1st rd pick was a fair deal probably would've bene different if Smith was coming off a really good year rather than an ACL.

    Maybe it wouldn't have made a difference as you say... we will never know.

  10. #69
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    7,464
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    Perhaps, but the media narrative that a late 1st rd pick was a fair deal probably would've bene different if Smith was coming off a really good year rather than an ACL.

    Maybe it wouldn't have made a difference as you say... we will never know.
    Yeah the media narrative would have been very interesting. They'd still have been itching to take Geelongs side but I'm not sure how they could possibly have spun it other than we had little leverage.

  11. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    34,095
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    If Smith had a blinding 2024 with us then I’m backing other clubs would’ve thrown outrageous offers around too. With several Vic clubs with top 10 picks and huge salary cap, even North, it could’ve been more of a contest to get him.

    His ACL when he did it, immediately hurt his value. That’s sport I guess.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  12. #71
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    10,891
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Quote Originally Posted by jazzadogs View Post
    Had to laugh a little at this bit - there was lots of criticism of Cats/Saints/North for not paying up and meeting our demands for the players that they targeted. But when we don't pay up it's good negotiating haha.
    No criticism from me - that's all part of the negotiation process. Ultimately these clubs all parted with more than they initially were willing to negotiate (even Geelong with a pick downgrade). We didn't in the case of XOH.

  13. #72
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    34,095
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    No criticism from me - that's all part of the negotiation process. Ultimately these clubs all parted with more than they initially were willing to negotiate (even Geelong with a pick downgrade). We didn't in the case of XOH.
    Will be interesting if our offer was the reported 3 years whether GWS offer him 3 next year on the coin we were offering. If they don’t it could well be we chase him again, with a much lower pick to be offered. So they may need to make that offer or risk losing him. If they were prepared to trade him it’s hard to see them extending him like that, but they might. That we made a final minutes move to get him to me makes me think our interest will be there next year if GWS don’t give him what we would.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  14. #73
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    14,451
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2024 Trade Period (after 7.30 Wednesday)

    Quote Originally Posted by jeemak View Post
    People forget how good Smith could be. Can't say for sure he'd not have been all over the shop this year, can't say for sure he won't be for the rest of his career. But his 2021 (especially finals) and early to mid 2022 were rolled gold elite. All in his apparently non-preferred role.

    Anything close to that this year would have put so much more quality in the places we lack versus a Brisbane. But as you say, can't help dumb luck.

    He'll enjoy his time inside until he gets found out and put back into his allegedly non-preferred role.
    Ironically it all unraveled and went downhill when he head butted Zach Tuoghy and then the photo came out.
    More of an In Bruges guy?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •