Following our exes...................

[Happy Days]

Aw man, we don’t wanna see this.

[jazzadogs]

I think he'll play some great footy for the Roos. I'll be interested to see if he gets any centre bounce midfield time, because he never really got that opportunity in his 9 years with us (from what I remember).

Not sure if it was the chicken or the egg, but his confidence in decision making and skill execution early in the season was really low. He was playing solid AFL football in the back half of the year.

[Mofra]

I think he'll play some great footy for the Roos. I'll be interested to see if he gets any centre bounce midfield time, because he never really got that opportunity in his 9 years with us (from what I remember).

Not sure if it was the chicken or the egg, but his confidence in decision making and skill execution early in the season was really low. He was playing solid AFL football in the back half of the year.

North's kicking out of the back half was woeful this year. He might end up a victim of his own good disposal and they find he's too important in getting the ball out of D50 to give him the 50% of midfield time he wants.

[GVGjr]

It sounds like that from Caleb's perspective Daniel Pratt didn't want him in the back line because of a lack of leg speed.

[jeemak]

It sounds like that from Caleb's perspective Daniel Pratt didn't want him in the back line because of a lack of leg speed.

Was about to say this one seems like it was more than just a Bevo decision to keep him on the outer limits of the team.

[G-Mo77]

IMO leaving him out so much cost us a few games early and letting him go will cost us going forward. It's one thing to get a nice number on draft day, that number doesn't give you any heart or soul though, something we've cut deep into. I will probably get a few @s but don't care. We should have played him more and we should not have traded him.

[Bullies]

I think it was an issue down back as he stifled our run. Bevo/Pratt wanted fast movement and Daniel likes to hold the ball, run around in circles and then deliver a 15m pass sideways. It was also one of the reasons he no longer took the kick ins.

[jazzadogs]

IMO leaving him out so much cost us a few games early and letting him go will cost us going forward. It's one thing to get a nice number on draft day, that number doesn't give you any heart or soul though, something we've cut deep into. I will probably get a few @s but don't care. We should have played him more and we should not have traded him.

I'm really sad to see him go, and wish we had identified earlier that he didn't have a spot at half back and spent time training him as a wing/half forward/small forward/Duryea replacement. He is too high quality to not be getting games SOMEWHERE in the field, and I've been consistent that it was a failure of coaching to not find him a spot.

But I don't think the club got it wrong playing Bramble and Freijah ahead of him in that half back role. They both performed well, and particularly Freijah deserved and blossomed from his opportunities. Caleb only really got his chances later in the season because JJ was injured and Ed was playing midfield.

[comrade]

Thanks, I hate it.

[Dogs 24/7]

We have a lot of trouble getting players over to the club when they are in their prime so is there a scenario now where we need to change our approach and be more open to trade players like Daniel when we can achieve a good deal?
We might all want a our good players being one club players but the AFL is moving towards more players changing clubs so perhaps we need to accept it and start getting back decent returns on players when we no longer have a defined role for players.
I rated Caleb highly but I think we got a good return in that trade.
Some soccer clubs remain competitive because they will trade players when they can get good value in that trade.